I have a working theory about workplace trends: assign any behavior that has persisted for decades a hyphenated descriptor, and within a year HR will be issuing formal guidance on it.
Let’s examine micro-shifting and the sudden authority with which employees now invoke it. Working parents, after all, have been negotiating lunch hours long enough to squeeze in a pediatrician appointment since long before anyone reading this was hired. What’s genuinely new isn’t the behavior – it’s the label. And a label is worth putting to the test.
Start with the obvious test: a minute spent answering a text is unambiguously micro. Fifteen minutes spent dropping something at the post office is defensibly micro. But a color, cut, and blowout runs closer to three hours, and I have yet to meet a single person who describes that as a quick break. A mani-pedi, with the requisite quarter hour for the polish to properly set, edges toward ninety minutes. Somewhere along the way, it seems, the word “micro” stopped describing duration and started describing level of permission. It’s an interruption that gets to call itself ordinary, regardless of how long it runs, provided it’s bookended by work on either side. Or so, perhaps, we assume.
Which raises some more interesting questions like what occupies the space between these work shifts? Does it matter? Provided the work still gets done?
The Full Menu
Once I began cataloguing it, the way one might if drafting an actual HR policy on the subject, the range of breaks required to keep a personal life functioning turned out to be considerably wider than the term implies. There’s going to the dentist. There’s taking Mr. Crumples to the vet whenever his ears resume doing that one thing again. There’s the grocery pickup timed to outrun the after-school scramble and the need to return my library book before I get a late charge. And then there are the larger blocks: the color and cut, the wedding-adjacent mani-pedi, the once-a-year ophthalmologist appointment that inevitably runs long. None of these qualify as a “break” in the traditional sense – the fifteen-minute variety once sanctioned by a poster in the breakroom or a clause in the employee handbook. Strung together, this resembles, instead, a second life – running concurrently with the first and held together by whatever bandwidth happens to remain.
None of this comes free, however, simply because any single instance of it is brief. The organizational behavior researcher Sophie Leroy has spent the better part of two decades documenting what she calls attention residue: the finding that when we move from one task to another, some portion of our cognitive attention remains lodged in the task we just left, regardless of how deliberately we try to leave it behind. The effect doesn’t appear to discriminate by scale, either; her research suggests it registers as readily during a brief pause for an unrelated errand as it does during a full change of major projects.
And that is a considerably more elegant way of saying what most of us already suspect from experience: that returning from ninety minutes at the hair salon and dropping straight back into a budget spreadsheet asks more of the brain than the calendar notation “out of office” accounts for. The true expense of micro-shifting is never really about stepping away or heading for a walk around the block or doing the school-run; it’s the tally of how many times a day we ask our own attention to fully disengage, and then, moments later, fully re-engage somewhere else.
Is There a Limit?
I think there is, though its precise shape is fuzzy. Organizations with defined core hours – say, everyone expected to be reachable between 10 and 3, with the outer bands of the day left open for whatever life requires – seem to manage this better than the ones still operating on the fiction that everyone is equally available from 9 to 5 and equally invisible outside it.
But while core hours help considerably with coordination, they don’t really solve for energy. What happens when your best two hours of the day – the hours in which your brain is genuinely equipped for the difficult, unglamorous thinking your job requires – land squarely inside the organization’s core hours? And then those same core hours happen to contain the only available therapy appointment, the only DMV slot without a two-hour line, and the only salon opening before the holidays? Core hours don’t resolve that particular collision; they simply relocate it.
Look – I’m generally in favor of micro-shifting. I love it, in fact. I’ve also had the good fortune to work for organizations, and in roles, where it was genuinely available; not everyone in every job has that luxury. Micro-shifting promises to let the work bend around a life rather than the reverse, and I remain in favor of that.
No matter what we end up calling it next.
—–
photo credit: Public Health Image Library from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
